DEVELOPMENT AND MODERNITY

The influence of the state industrial policy on the formation of competitive advantages of national production complexes

Authors

  • Nikita A. Arlazarov Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory, 1
  • Timofei V. Tatarov https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8499-8775 Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory, 1

How to cite

GOST Arlazarov N. A., Tatarov T. V. The influence of the state industrial policy on the formation of competitive advantages of national production complexes // Academic Research Journal. 2026. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 48-59. DOI: 10.25726/n7870-5190-5803-k
APA Arlazarov, N. A. & Tatarov, T. V. (2026). The influence of the state industrial policy on the formation of competitive advantages of national production complexes. Academic Research Journal, 4(2), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.25726/n7870-5190-5803-k

Abstract

The subordination of industrial policy instruments to the competitive positions of national production complexes remains contested: horizontal regulation is treated either as a sufficient condition for building competitiveness or as a neutral background against which sectoral selection and localisation prove decisive. The study aims to quantify the channels through which state regulation of manufacturing is converted into sustainable competitive advantages of a processing complex. The calculation rests on an author's model of a production complex for 2021-2026; horizontal and vertical analysis, factor decomposition by chain substitution, scenario modelling and simulation with ten thousand iterations are applied. Decomposition of the 0.24-point increment of the integral competitiveness index showed that the largest contribution comes from the reduction of the share of imported components (about 0.11 points), whereas the fluctuation of profitability in 2025 produced a negative component of roughly 0.04 points. The scenario calculation recorded an increment of the index towards 2026 ranging from 0.03 points under the inertial regime to 0.12 points under active selective support, while the proportion of runs with positive discounted income rose from 0.62 to 0.89. The resulting distribution of contributions means that a competitive advantage is formed mainly through structural reconfiguration of the production base – localisation and asset renewal – rather than through direct subsidising of current operating activity; horizontal and selective instruments thereby reveal different response elasticities and are not interchangeable.

Keywords

industrial policy competitive advantages production complex localisation technological sovereignty factor analysis competitiveness

Funding

The authors did not declare any external funding for this research.

References

Babich O.V., Korkhova E.N. New industrial policy as the basis of the country's competitiveness // Global Scientific Potential. 2021. № 8 (125). pp. 166-168.

Belanova N.N., Trubchaninova E.A. Development of the competitive environment and the state industrial policy // Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2021. Vol. 11. № 4. pp. 799-814.

Dubrovskiy V.Zh., Starikov E.N. The structure of industrial policy in the context of the institutional and technological development of the national industrial system // Natural Sciences and Humanities Research. 2025. № 1 (57). pp. 179-183.

Ilyina S., Sokolov A. Formation of a system of sectoral measures and mechanisms of state support for the electronic industry // Society and Economy. 2024. № 4. pp. 26-43.

Kovalev V.E. Strategic priorities of the development of industrial complexes as a factor of ensuring industrial competitiveness in modern conditions // Economics and Management in Mechanical Engineering. 2025. № 5. pp. 42-45.

Kovalev V.E., Yaroshevich N.Yu. New competition vs technological sovereignty: modern principles of the development of industrial production // Natural Sciences and Humanities Research. 2024. № 5 (55). pp. 160-168.

Kozlov A.V., Kozlov V.V., Fomin M.V. The influence of the import substitution policy on the competitiveness of innovative industrial enterprises of the region // Economics and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2024. Vol. 7. № 5 (146). pp. 148-154.

Nikitina E.A., Ryabov A.A., Potoroka Yu.S. Industrial policy in the field of competitiveness of Russian manufacturers // Economics of Construction. 2024. № 9. pp. 136-138.

Nikulin R.A. Ensuring the technological sovereignty and competitiveness of the state // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2022. № 11 (148). pp. 146-149.

Petrov M.V. Industrial policy as a direction of the economic strategy of the state // Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2022. Vol. 12. № 8. pp. 2117-2134.

Reshetova N.Yu., Semidotskiy V.A., Yakimenko A.A. Organisational foundations and economic methods of state management of the development of competitiveness of regional industrial complexes // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2021. № 1 (126). pp. 433-438.

Simachev Yu.V., Fedyunina A.A. Priorities and instruments of modern industrial policy: subsidies for a complex economy // Economic Issues. 2025. № 8. pp. 5-25.

Tsvetkov V.A., Shmanev S.V., Morkovkin D.E., Semenov A.V., Niyazbekova Sh.U. Methodological imperatives of the formation of industrial policy in the context of ensuring the technological sovereignty of the national economy // Forging and Stamping Production. Material Working by Pressure. 2025. № 4. pp. 95-103.

Tszelin Ch. Comparative analysis of instruments for the development of industrial complexes: the world, China and Russia // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2025. № 9 (182). pp. 30-36.

Chizhova E.N., Medvedev I.P., Balabanova G.G. Institutional models of industrial policy: approaches to typology // Economics. Information Technologies. 2025. Vol. 52. № 1. pp. 95-109.

Issue

Section

DEVELOPMENT AND MODERNITY

Metrics

199 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.